Legal Opinion

American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schattman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1988No. 2-88-210-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELTNER, Justice.

The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to grant an order to reinstate a case 254 days after it had been dismissed for want of prosecution. While we hold the trial court did not have jurisdiction to reinstate, the issue is complicated because the record reflects that no notice of the dismissal was given to the plaintiff until 234 days after judgment was entered.

The real party in interest, Willie Mae Thompson, brought an action to set aside a worker’s compensation settlement agreement against the relator, American General Fire…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Scurlock Oil Co. v. SmithwickTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lucas v. United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Medeles v. Nunez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  2. Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc. v. H & S Supply Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  3. Norman Communications, Inc. v. Texas Eastman Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
  4. Levit v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  5. Gerald King v. BASF Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API