Dain Bosworth Inc. v. Brandhorst
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHLEGEL, Judge.
Petitioner, Richard Brandhorst, appeals the trial court’s decree enjoining him from violating the terms of a noncompetition agreement. He asserts that no injunctive relief should have been granted because the noncompetition agreement does not further legitimate business purposes. He also asserts the time and distance restrictions of the agreement are unreasonable. We affirm.
On June 26, 1981, Brandhorst and Dain Bosworth, a securities dealer, entered into an employment contract. As part of that contract, Dain Bosworth agreed to train Brandhorst to be a stockbroker. In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ehlers v. Iowa Warehouse CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Iowa Glass Depot, Inc. v. JindrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Cogley Clinic v. MartiniSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Stoller Fisheries, Inc. v. American Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Orkin Exterminating Company v. BurnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Uncle B's Bakery, Inc. v. O'ROURKEDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Dental East, P.C. v. WestercampCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1988
- Rasmussen Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. IdsoCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
- Uncle B's Bakery, Inc. v. O'ROURKEDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.