Reed v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
This is a diversity action. Defendant has moved to dismiss under F.R.Civ.P. 12(b). Defendant asserts that plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the complaint in that the claims alleged arise exclusively under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736 as amended, 77 P.S. § 1 et seq. (“Act”). For the reasons below, we deny defendant’s motion.
Plaintiff alleges and defendant does not deny that plaintiff was injured…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Evans v. Allentown Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Antonio Aceto v. Zurich Insurance Company. Maria De Martino, Administratrix of the Estate of Stephano De Martino v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Boal v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
3Cited by37 opinions
- Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hayes v. Aetna Fire UnderwritersMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Baker v. American States InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.