Legal Opinion

Thomas Kernick v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1961No. 16582_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a final order denying defendant Kernick’s motion, filed July 13, 1960, to correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.

Defendant’s present motion to correct sentence is based solely on the following allegation: “It is the opinion of this deponent that the sentence of four years on Count II of the said indictment was incorrect and unconstitutional for the reason that no evidence was offered or received at the trial to support a conviction on the said Count II.”

Defendant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. George Edward Duggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  4. Cox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. Lawrence Callanan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyd Augustine Willis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Boyd Augustine Willis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API