Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Castaneda

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 2003No. WD 62281PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a marital dissolution action. The first question presented is whether the husband’s allegations of child abuse and/or neglect should have triggered the mandatory appointment of a guardian ad litem to protect the children’s interests. The second question presented is whether the trial court should have granted the wife’s written motion for a continuance, which she filed pro se only one day before trial.

We conclude that the trial court should have appointed a guardian ad litem. Because the trial court failed to do so, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Eckhoff v. EckhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Ledbetter v. SampsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Renfro v. FehrmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. T.L.D. v. A.L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API