Legal Opinion

State v. Otto

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 2011No. COA11-189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Judge.

Megan Sue Otto (Defendant) appeals from a judgment imposing a suspended sentence based on her conviction for driving while impaired. On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying her motion to suppress on the grounds that the arresting officer lacked the required reasonable suspicion immediately prior to the stop that she was driving while impaired. For the following reasons, we reverse.

On 29 February 2008, Trooper Ashley Brent Smith of the North Carolina Highway Patrol noticed that Defendant was weaving from the center line to the fog line. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. StylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. KochukCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. OttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. OttoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API