Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Preston

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1992No. 300-91Published

1Opinion of the Court

833 S.W.2d 515 (1992)

Ex parte Carl Thomas PRESTON.

No. 300-91.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

April 1, 1992.

On Denial of Rehearing June 24, 1992.

Ken J. McLean, Roy G. Romo, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Timothy G. Taft, Dave Pendleton, Kelley Siegler, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was originally charged in a single indictment with three counts of aggravated robbery. After the jury was impaneled and…

Also in this document: Concurrence · White; Per curiam; Dissent; Concurrence · Clinton.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API