Legal Opinion

Baucum & Kimball v. Garrett Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 2, 1937No. 34446PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

The plaintiff, an ordinary partnership engaged in the business of buying and selling cotton on the future market and in buying cotton from customers “on call/’ instituted this suit to recover from the defendants, a commercial partnership and the individual members thereof, one of plaintiff’s customers from whom it bought 397 bales of cotton “on call,” the sum of $1,928.22, alleged to be due it as a result of the transaction.

A sale “on call” is explained by plaintiff in one of the allegations of its petition to be as follows:

“When cotton is sold ‘on call’, the seller and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conner v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  2. Stewart Bros. v. BeesonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  3. E. O. Stanard Milling Co. v. FlowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  4. Baucum & Kimball v. Garrett Mercantile Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. A Better Place, Inc. v. Giani Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Tahoe Corp. v. P & G GATHERING SYSTEMSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Bolin Farms v. American Cotton Shippers AssociationDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1974
  4. Wilson v. SawyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. J. PEREZ, SA v. Louisiana Rice Growers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API