Fortgang v. Chase Manhattan Bank
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, in the following memorandum: An issue of fact was raised on the trial as to whether the building lessee maintained properly placed mats on the lobby floor during rainy weather and kept the uncovered áreas free of excessive moisture. While the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert was hardly capable of inspiring confidence, it cannot be disregarded as a matter of law.
Concur; Judges Burke, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Chief Judge Fuxd and Judge Sculepfi dissent and vote to affirm on the memorandum at the Appellate Division,
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hilsman v. Sarwil Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Charles Spinner v. 1725 York Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rowland v. Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026