Redding v. Tanner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAndrews, Chief Judge
As noted in the majority, this Court conducts a de novo review of the evidence in considering summary judgment grant of denial. Goring v. Martinez, 224 Ga. App. 137 (479 SE2d 432) (1996); Gaskins v. Hand, 219 Ga. App. 823 (466 SE2d 688) (1996). Additionally, the grant of summary judgment will be affirmed on appeal if it is right for any reason. Deese v. NationsBank, 222 Ga. App. 275, 277 (1) (474 SE2d 18) (1996). Although I concur in Division 1 of the majority, I must respectfully dissent because I believe that, given the uncontested facts, Tanner was entitled to summary judgment on the issue…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goring v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Gaskins v. HandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Osburn v. PilgrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Stegall v. Central Georgia Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Newman v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.