Legal Opinion

Wright v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1988No. 4266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaird, P.J.

This cause came on before the court upon David B. Wright’s appeal from the order of the trial court affirming the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. We affirm.

David Wright was employed by Pinkerton’s, Inc. as a security guard at the rank of sergeant. On February 24, 1986, Wright was told by David Bly, a captain, and William Giesser, a Pinkerton’s manager, that he was being reassigned to another location. Wright ultimately refused the reassignment.

On February 24, 1986, Wright filed for unemployment compensation. The application was disallowed; the administrator found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Angelkovski v. Buckeye Potato Chips Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Cincinnati v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Nordonia Hills City School District Board of Education v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Connectronics Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Bodensieck v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Hale v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API