Legal Opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 18, 2008No. 2006-1602PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Honeywell International, Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. (collectively “Honeywell”) brought suit against Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (“Sundstrand”) for infringement of claims 8, 10, 11, 19, and 23 of United States Patent No. 4,380,893 (“the '893 patent”) and claim 4 of Patent No. 4,428,194 (“the '194 patent”). Because “rewriting of de*1307pendent claims into independent form coupled with the cancellation of the original independent claims creates a presumption of prosecution history estoppel,” this court vacated an earlier infringement verdict in favor of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Scanner Technologies Corp. v. Icos Vision Systems Corporation N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S, WDH Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.