Legal Opinion

Barker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 18, 2019No. 3:18-cv-08136Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Bradley Barker, No. CV-18-08136-PCT-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees under the Equal 16 Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (Doc. 21.) 17 “The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) instructs that this court ‘shall’ grant 18 attorneys[’] fees to a prevailing plaintiff ‘unless’ the government meets its burden to 19 demonstrate that both its litigation position and the agency decision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API