Legal Opinion

Brendle v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1899PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Civil ActioN for damages for personal injuries occasioned by the alleged wanton and willful conduct of defendants’ employees, tried before Btarbuck, Jat June Term, 1899, of the Superior Court of SwaiN County. The whole case is covered by the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Douguas, «T.

This is a civil action for damages against the defendants as receivers of the Richmond & Danville Railroad Company, caused by the alleged negligent and willful conduct of the defendants’ servant in frightening horses driven by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff alleged in his complaint, that while .driving a pair of horses to a hack one-half mile up the Tuckaseigee River from Bryson City, he went into the mouth of Deep Creek to water his horses, and that while his horses were so being watered, the defendant ran one of its trains over the trestle crossing Deep Creek, willfully, wantonly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Everett v. Receivers of Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Everett v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Alsever v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Fry v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Ballew v. Asheville & East Tennessee RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Pearce v. BarhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API