People v. Bell

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statement to the police, tangible evidence seized by the police at the time of his arrest and the complainants’ identification testimony. The police had reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant, who matched the detailed descriptions provided by witnesses and was observed in temporal and geographical proximity to the burglaries (see, People v Private, 259 AD2d 504; People v Erazo, 256 AD2d 16, 17, Iv denied 92 NY2d 1048). The fact that the police were apprehending…