Legal Opinion

City of Darlington v. Kilgo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 1990No. 23213Published

1DissentGoolsby, Acting Associate Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The respondents City of Darlington, City of Hartsville, and several individuals living either in or near these municipalities brought this action against the Darlington County Administrator and the members of the Darlington County Council to enjoin them from implementing an ordinance that created sometime prior to May 11,1987, in all unincorporated areas of Darlington County, with the exception of two areas protected by rural fire districts, a fire protection district, called the Darlington County Fire Protection District. The new district embraces unincorporated areas…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coosaw Mining Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. City of Myrtle Beach v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Mills v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Privette v. GrinnellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Harling v. Board of Commissioners of Police Insurance & Annuity Fund of the State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API