Legal Opinion

Shull v. First Interstate Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1993No. 93-549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Defendants/Respondents Zycom, Inc. and Capital Development Company (collectively Zycom) have filed a motion to dismiss the September 21, 1993, notice of appeal filed by Plaintiff/Appellant William G. Shull d/b/a GAMO (Shull) and for attorney’s fees in bringing this motion. Shull opposes the motion to dismiss his first notice of appeal. The procedural facts before us, together with the interplay between the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure and the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, mandate our conclusion that the motion to dismiss should be granted.

*357In June, 1993, a jury…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trombley v. MannMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Estate of Pruyn v. Axmen Propane, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API