Legal Opinion
Wallhauser v. Rummel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 7, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
25 N.J. Super. 358 (1953)
96 A.2d 289
GEORGE M. WALLHAUSER, AS SUBSTITUTED ADMINISTRATOR C.T.A. OF THE WILL OF RACHEL A. WALLHAUSER, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CLARENCE S. RUMMEL, AS EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JULIA A. VOGT, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided April 7, 1953.
Messrs. Riker, Emery & Danzig (Mr. Charles Danzig appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.
Messrs. Lindabury, Steelman & Lafferty (Mr. William Rowe appearing), attorneys for the defendant Clarence S. Rummel, as executor, etc., and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fox v. SnowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Gellert v. LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Girard Trust Co. v. SchmitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Content v. DaltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- McCartin v. TraphagenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Millhurst Milling & Drying Co. v. Automobile Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Eggleston v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED FINOCCHIARO, SR. ESTATE OF ALFRED FINOCCHIARO, JR. VS. FRANK FINOCCHIARO(P-1257-2012, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017