Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Hobart v. Baum

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1956No. 18,608Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion

Crumpacker, P. J.

This is a class action commenced by the Farmers State Bank of Valparaiso in *71942. Through it said bank, claiming to be the owner of certain bonds issued by the City of Hobart for the construction of a district sewer pursuant to a proper improvement resolution and consequent assessment roll 251, sought recovery on said bonds both for itself and all other owners and holders of unpaid bonds issued on said roll. In 1954 the court permitted the ap-pellees, as members of the class represented by said bank, to come into the case as named plaintiffs, after which said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Siegel v. ArcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fouts v. LargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API