Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 6, 2002No. 5D02-3152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

AFFIRMED. Based on defendant’s numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Mr. Moore is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions relating to his conviction and - sentence in trial court case 05-1998-CF-004167-AXXX-XX, unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. See Rahymes v. State, 730 So.2d 420, 422 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dismissed, 733 So.2d 516 (Fla.1999); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133, 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410-11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Rahymes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Lockett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API