Nigro v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Only one question is presented, and that is whether the plaintiff established a cause of action.
The plaintiff proved that a bottle of Coca Cola taken from a vending machine at the United States naval station located at Tacoma, Washington, contained foreign matter which caused him to regurgitate and made him ill for a short period of time. He offered no evidence that the bottle of Coca Cola was supplied by the defendant, Coca Cola Bottling, Inc., a Washington corporation, or that the defendant had any connection whatsoever with the vending machine.
At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lundquist v. Coca Cola Bottling Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Baughman v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
- McNair v. Johnson & JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
- Welch v. COCA-COLA BOTTLERS'ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Hart v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963