Legal Opinion

Nigro v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1957No. 33723PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Only one question is presented, and that is whether the plaintiff established a cause of action.

The plaintiff proved that a bottle of Coca Cola taken from a vending machine at the United States naval station located at Tacoma, Washington, contained foreign matter which caused him to regurgitate and made him ill for a short period of time. He offered no evidence that the bottle of Coca Cola was supplied by the defendant, Coca Cola Bottling, Inc., a Washington corporation, or that the defendant had any connection whatsoever with the vending machine.

At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lundquist v. Coca Cola Bottling Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  2. Baughman v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
  3. McNair v. Johnson & JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Welch v. COCA-COLA BOTTLERS'ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Hart v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API