McCaughn v. Philadelphia Barge Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The defense most strongly insisted on is based on section 607 of the Revenue Act of 1928 (26 USCA § 2607). That section provides in substance that: “Any tax * * * paid * * * after the expiration of the period of limitation properly applicable thereto shall be considered an overpayment and shall be credited or refunded to the taxpayer. * * * ” The defendant’s position is that if, as a result of this suit, the taxpayer *666should be compelled to pay any money to the government, it would be immediately recoverable as an overpayment under the above section, since both…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Norrie v. LohmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. SchwartzDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954