Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 1995No. 94-02440PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHATLEY, Judge.

The appellant, Michael Delano Scott, challenges his judgment and sentence for robbery with a firearm. We find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in imposing a cost of $2.00 pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), without announcing that cost at sentencing. That cost was a discretionary cost, which required notice and an opportunity to be heard. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Priest v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly 84, — So.2d-(Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 28, 1994); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Since Scott was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API