Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sortina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 18, 1989, which assessed the employer for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

*923The employer is a brokerage firm appealing from the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which found claimant and other similarly situated securities sales representatives to be employees for the purposes of unemployment insurance benefits. Having reviewed the record, we are unpersuaded by the employer’s arguments and conclude that the decision should be affirmed.

We initially note that the record…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ShortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of De VoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re Denny Nash, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API