Legal Opinion
State v. Lee
Hamilton County Municipal Court
Decided June 23, 1983No. C 83 CRB 5918A and BPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAlbanese, J.
The defendant, David F. Lee, has moved to suppress the evidence of his arrests. He maintains that the arrests in his home were illegal because they violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
The defendant was a passenger in a friend’s car parked on the side of Lee’s home at approximately 3:00 a.m. on March 21, 1983. The car was parked in the lot of a commercial heating and air conditioning business in a commercial district separated from the residential district where Lee’s home was located by a six-foot fence. The backyards of the homes on Ponce…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Middleburg Heights v. TheissOhio Court of Appeals · 1985