Legal Opinion
Chmielewski v. Xermac, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 12, 1996No. Docket 162968PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right a jury verdict for defendant in this handicap discrimination case. We affirm.
Plaintiff worked as a salesperson for defendant from November 1985 until June 29, 1990. He underwent a liver transplant in June 1989 for cirrhosis of the liver caused by alcoholism and was off work for approximately six weeks before being released to return to work by his physician. His employment was terminated approximately seven months later, allegedly because of his failure to meet sales quotas.
In October 1990, plaintiff instituted this action against defendant for violation of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stanke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Joyce v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Sclafani v. Peter S Cusimano, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gazette v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Temple v. Kelel Distributing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Chmielewski v. Xermac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Ellsworth v. Hotel Corp. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cipri v. Bellingham Frozen Foods, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Krohn v. Sedgwick James of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.