Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Todd

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided December 15, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to discharge attachment. The facts are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGholson, J.

There are two grounds on which the present motion is rested: 1. That the charge of a fraudulent disposition of property is untrue. 2. That the present action is founded on a judgment rendered by a Justice of the Peace; that in the course of the proceedings before the Justice, the same charge was made, and decided not to be tenable, and the order of attachment issued upon it was discharged. It is, therefore, claimed that both the present action and the order of attachment issued in it, are vexatious and should be dismissed.

Upon the first ground, affidavits have been offered, on the part, both…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hiler v. HilerOhio Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Walker v. WalkerDarke County Court of Common Pleas · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API