Legal Opinion
Poteat v. Rich Products Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2004No. 03-1497UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Rich Products Corp. (“Rich Products”) appeals a district court’s order denying its Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Claims. 1 Rich Products, headquartered in New York, hired Dorothy Poteat, a South Carolina resident, in 2000 as a bakery trainer/eonsultant. On January 13, 2003, Poteat filed a complaint against Rich Products under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000), alleging that for the past three years she worked an average of at least sixty hours per week, that she was entitled to overtime compensation of at least one and one-half times…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Choice Hotels International, Incorporated v. Bsr Tropicana Resort, Incorporated, a Florida Corporation Susan Hounsom Milton JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Orkin, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Wilson v. WillisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Stonegate Insurance Company v. Fletcher Reinsurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021