Moon v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Attention is directed to some inaccuracies in the synopsis of the evidence. There was testimony to the effect that the fence over which the controversy arose was situated on land which was under the control of the appellant. In calling it a “boundary fence” we were unhappy in the choice of words; and in stating the acreage of the Carlson land rented by the. deceased we were inaccurate. The discrepancies, however, are entirely without weight on the legal question upon which the case turns. The evidence to the effect that the fence which it is…