Legal Opinion
Edward Tyler Nahem Fine Art, L.L.C. v. Barral
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 2016No. 177 651137/10PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered August 4, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a nonjury trial, denied the causes of action for piercing the corporate veil and fraud, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record amply supports the trial court’s findings, based in part on credibility determinations (see 300 E. 34th St. Co. v Habeeb, 248 AD2d 50, 54 [1st Dept 1997]), that defendant did not improperly use company funds for personal expenses, did not fail to adhere to corporate formalities, and did not significantly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Street Trust Co. v. ErnstNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- 300 East 34th Street Co. v. HabeebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- James v. Loran Realty V Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- James v. Loran Realty V Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Americore Drilling & Cutting, Inc. v. EMB Contr. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of DePetris v. TrainaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Waran v. Christie's Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018