Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Fraternal Aid Union
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 31, 1929No. 1234-NPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, certificate holders in a fraternal insurance society, complain that certain officers of the society are spending the society’s money illegally,' are paying themselves, their relatives, and their friends sums in excess of what they are entitled to; are spending society money for the personal purpose of perpetuating themselves in the polities of the society, and that a consolidation is planned, largely, it is claimed, for the purpose of the personal profit of the promoters of the plan. It is also complained that the president is an executive officer of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Frank E. Berman v. Narragansett Racing Association, Inc., Frank E. Berman v. Burrillville Racing Association, Inc., Frank E. Berman v. The New Hampshire Jockey Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Boesenberg v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- William J. Troup v. Harold F. McCartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Berman v. Narragansett Racing Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.