Legal Opinion

Laventhal v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1908No. Civ. No. 473PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for $1,475 upon an accident insurance policy. This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll with a bill of exceptions.

On January 2, 1903, the defendant issued to plaintiff an accident insurance policy, which provided that the company “does insure the person described in said schedule [the plaintiff herein] for the period of one year from noon, standard time, the day this contract is dated, against disability or death resulting directly, and independently of all other causes, from bodily injury sustained through external, violent and accidental means ...…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Preferred Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Annie WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Merrill v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of America v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  5. Letherer v. United States Health & Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Kennard v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  3. Field v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. O'Brien v. Wise Upson Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Walters v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API