Legal Opinion

Bank of Stockton v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1884No. 8,300PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

—There was testimony tending to show that the note the defendant executed to Owens & Moore was by that firm assigned after maturity to the plaintiff, as collateral security for the payment of a note of Owens & Moore, and of certain overdrafts of theirs. Subsequently another member was admitted into the firm of Owen’s & Moore, after which the firm transacted its business under the name of Owens, Moore & Co. The overdraft account with the plaintiff was, as expressed by the cashier of the plaintiff, “continued right along under the name of Owens, Moore & Co.,” and the note of Owens & Moore, for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Reynolds v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Daniels v. CarrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  5. Hall v. ThurstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API