Legal Opinion

Mary Kate LEAMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1987No. 85-3471Published

1Opinion of the Court

825 F.2d 946

44 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 795,

43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,241

Mary Kate LEAMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENT

DISABILITIES, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-3471.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Reargued Nov. 12, 1986.

Decided July 23, 1987.

Marc D. Mezibov, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

Deborah A. Piperni, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, Tim Mangan, Gene Holliker (argued), for defendants-appellees.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and ENGEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Keith; Dissent · Merritt; Dissent · Jones; Dissent · Milburn.

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API