Legal Opinion
Conchito v. City of Tulsa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 18, 1974No. M-73-391PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRETT, Judge:
The appellant, Chico Conchito, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the Municipal Court, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, in Case No. 153732 for the crime of Using Profane and Obscene Language Which Insulted and Offended a Person, in violation of Title 27, Section 122, of the Tulsa Revised Ordi*1386nances. He was sentenced to pay a fine of One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars and to serve a term of Ninety (90) days in the city jail, after a trial before the judge, said sentence being suspended. A timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.
This…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AutheletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- State v. AutheletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Allen v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Mayberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Wainman v. BowlerMontana Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.