Legal Opinion
Kearney v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 1244 C.D. 1983 and 1245 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
Claimants appeal from orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), affirming referee’s decisions denying benefits under section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.1 We affirm.
*406Although the above-captioned cases have not been consolidated, they arise from the same factual circumstances and were heard and decided together by the Board. We shall, therefore, treat both cases together in this opinion.
Claimants are members of the Iron Workers Union, Local 818 (Local 818) who were employed by Adams Steel Erection (Employer) under a permit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. TickleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Renne v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Fox Grocery Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- General Electric Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pottorff v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Aaron v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hercules v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997