(PS) Hawk v. Flix North America, Inc
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWN HAWK, No. 2:23–cv–00049–KJM CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 13 v. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 14 FLIX NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, requests leave to proceed in 18 forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 (ECF No. 2.) See
28 U.S.C. § 1915
(authorizing the commencement of 19 an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees). 20 The court finds that it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.