Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1939No. O-985Published

1Opinion of the Court

-’ - THEATITORNEY GENERAE OFTEXAS A-RN- DsLCNF,-L . . .,...... _ _.- . . -._.-.-.--_.-._ Hoa..T. M. Trlmble Opinion m:o-905 First Assistant Ret (a) From what fund, school or State SuperInt endent county, should court costs and attor- Austin, Texas ney’s fees incIdent.to foreclosure by county of vendor’s lien on county school lands, be paid. (b) From what fuud, school or county, should delin- quent and current taxes on county school lands be paid by county owning same. (c) Should the County Schol- astic 4pportIontnent be first taken from the County Available School Fund before other allowable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dallas County v. Club Land and Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Thompson v. Elmo Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. McKinney's Administratrix v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Dodson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API