Legal Opinion
Dee-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Heveafil Sdn. Bhd.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2002No. 01-1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Senior Judge MICHAEL joined.
OPINION
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge.
Two United States companies that purchase rubber thread brought this private antitrust action, alleging a price-fixing conspiracy led by Southeast Asian producers of the thread. After an eight-day trial, the jury returned a special verdict, finding that although one or more of the producers engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices that was intended to affect United States commerce, that conspiracy had no “substantial effect” on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metallgesellschaft Ag and Mgts Uk Holding v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, Sumitomo Corporation, Yasuo HamanakaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Dee-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Heveafil Sdn. BhdCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Metallgesellschaft v. Sumitomo Corp AmericCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003