Legal Opinion

Frkovich v. Petranovich

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1944No. 4826PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

From the court’s findings of fact which are suppprted by substantial evidence, the following' we deem sufficient recital to an understanding of the case.

The plaintiff executed a promissory note and a real property mortgage to secure the same, both in favor of the defendant. The real property described in the mortgage was the community property of the plaintiff and her husband, Max Frkovich, who at the time of the execution of the note and mortgage was an incompetent person, for whose estate Alfred Myers was the appointed and acting guardian. At that time and up to and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Jenkins v. HuntsingerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Fidelity Union Insurance v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Janney v. Fullroe, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gibson v. WestobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. C & L Lumber & Supply, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/GaleriaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Vincent v. United Nuclear-Homestake PartnersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Blevins v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API