Legal Opinion

McKinzie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 20, 2003No. 1D02-1035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

This is a timely appeal of a final order of judgment and sentence. Appellant alleges that the trial court erred in excluding the testimony of a potential defense witness based on a sequestration violation without having conducted a proper inquiry pursuant to Atkinson v. State, 317 So.2d 807 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). We agree, reverse the conviction and sentence, and remand for a new trial.

Appellant’s car was repossessed, and an inventory of the car was conducted by a recovery company’s employee who allegedly discovered cocaine in the car. During that employee’s testimony, the owner of the recovery…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. Atkinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. State Department of Insurance v. First Floridian Auto & Home InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DHSMV v. BrandenburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Cokely v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API