McKinzie v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.
This is a timely appeal of a final order of judgment and sentence. Appellant alleges that the trial court erred in excluding the testimony of a potential defense witness based on a sequestration violation without having conducted a proper inquiry pursuant to Atkinson v. State, 317 So.2d 807 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). We agree, reverse the conviction and sentence, and remand for a new trial.
Appellant’s car was repossessed, and an inventory of the car was conducted by a recovery company’s employee who allegedly discovered cocaine in the car. During that employee’s testimony, the owner of the recovery…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Atkinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- State Department of Insurance v. First Floridian Auto & Home InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DHSMV v. BrandenburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Cokely v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014