Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Lourie Brown and Monique Brown

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2014No. 13-0764Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLo'Ughry, Justice

A mere five months after mishandling a substantial punitive damages verdict in Manor Care v. Douglas, 234 W.Va. 57, 763 S.E.2d 73 (2014), the majority has chosen to ignore federal jurisprudence by; affirming a punitive damage verdict that violates principles of due process. I write separately not only to express my disagreement with the majority’s decision to affirm the punitive damage award in the instant ease, but to articulate my staunch disagreement with the Court’s related decision in Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Brown, 230 W.Va. 306, 737 S.E.2d 640 (2012) (hereinafter “QuickenI”), to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Garnes v. Fleming Landfill, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API