Legal Opinion

Duke v. Worker' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1988No. A040342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

Petitioner Danny O. Duke (hereafter applicant) seeks review of that portion of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (hereafter Board) which rescinded an award of 15 and Vz percent permanent partial disability and further medical treatment made by the workers’ compensation judge (hereafter WCJ). We conclude that the Board, in denying permanent partial disability and further medical treatment for an industrially incurred sensitivity which precludes exposure to solvents, failed to consider applicant’s diminished ability to compete in the open labor market as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. LeBoeuf v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bstandig v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Miles v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Auburn Woods I Homeowners Ass'n v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Bracken v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API