Legal Opinion

Eshner v. City of Lakewood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1929No. 21545PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Lakewood of the violation of an ordinance of that city regulating the speed of automobiles, and the judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

Section 40 of the ordinance of the city of Lakewood which it is claimed Eshner violated provided -is follows: “Rate of speed, limitations, presumpions. No person shall operate, drive or propel and io owner thereof riding thereon or therein shall -ause or permit to be operated, driven or propelled, ¡n any public highway, bicycle, motorcycle, motoricycle, carriage,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Winters v. BisaillonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Abrams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. McKinnon v. PettiboneOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Community Traction Co. v. KonteOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API