Legal Opinion
Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Garfield Sanitary Felt Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 23, 1925No. Gen. No. 30,010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett
delivered the opinión of the court.
Plaintiff below is the plaintiff in error here. In a suit for goods sold and delivered there was an affidavit of merits, trial by jury and verdict for plaintiff. Defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was withdrawn, and it then moved for judgment non obstante veredicto, which was granted.
It is conceded this was error, for the reason that the motion could not be appropriately made in behalf of a defendant, and that the judgment must be reversed for that reason. Tribune Co. v. Dunlap Mfg. Co., 201 Ill. App. 408.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Teehan v. Union Bridge Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
- Quick v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Stein v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blair v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933