Legal Opinion
Herschaft v. New York City Campaign Finance Board
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 18, 2001No. 00 CV 3754 CBAPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AMON, District Judge.
The Court denied pro se plaintiff Allen Herschaft’s motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed his amended complaint in a Memorandum and Order (“Order”) dated December 8, 2000. In the amended complaint, plaintiff challenged the constitutionality of Section 3-03(c)(4)(i) of Title 52 of the Rules of the City of New York and Section 3T703(6) of New York City’s Administrative Code and Charter, which require that candidates for City offices seeking public matching funds comply with certain disclosure obligations. Plaintiff now moves for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Williams v. New York City Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Caldwell v. PesceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Johnson v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- In Re CorsoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.