Legal Opinion

Eichhammer v. Parsons

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.

This is a motion under Rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment dismissing the complaint for insufficiency on its face. The gravamen of the pleading is that the defendant converted a dwelling house ■ — ■ “ the property of the plaintiff ”— by refusing the plaintiff’s demand for permission to remove the structure from the land on which it stands. Judgment is demanded for the value of the house less the cost of removal and of a new foundation.

The allegations are that the defendant and her husband conveyed to the plaintiff real property therein described on which was a two-story frame…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Leonard v. . CloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Melton v. . Fullerton-Weaver Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Hart v. . WandleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Brown v. . Keeney Settlement Cheese Asso.New York Court of Appeals · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Didier v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API