Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 2019No. CV-18-367PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenneth S. Hixson, Judge

Appellants Woodrow Anderson III and Kandice A. Gibbons (co-trustees) appeal *145from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration of a complaint filed by appellees Seth Anderson and Trevor Anderson (beneficiaries). Appellants argue on appeal that the trial court was required to compel arbitration because there was a valid agreement containing an arbitration provision and the scope of the arbitration provision encompassed the dispute herein. Appellants further argue that the trial court erred in deciding that issues of fraud were for the court and not for arbitration. We affirm.

The Facts

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. ReitzTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. McArthur v. McArthurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Stipanuk v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Occidental Petroleum v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  2. MAY v. MAYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API