Legal Opinion

Briley v. Madrid Improvement Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 16, 1963No. 51021PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarsoN, J.

The only issue before us in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting lien priority to judgment creditors who caused garnishment to be levied against moneys or credits due the debtor on a real-estate contract, which contract had been assigned and deposited as collateral security for payment of debtor’s note to the appellant bank.

I. As a general rule, an attachment or garnishment is effective only to the extent of the debtor's interest in the property attached, and the lien does not displace prior equities or rights. The right first acquired is, as a rule, superior. It is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Baker's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. Inghram v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Howe & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Petty v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Vigars v. HewinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kintzel v. Wheatland Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Ehlers v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Verschoor v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. HL Munn Lumber Company v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Matter of RogersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API