Legal Opinion · Dissent

Enterprise Bank v. Rice

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 30, 1925No. 11815Published

1Dissent

I do not concur in the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice Watts in this case for the reasons which follow:

Action for the foreclosure of two mortgages, executed by the defendant, Jennie M. Rice, upon a tract of land in Colleton County, known as the Brick House Plantation. One of the mortgages was given to the Beaufort Bank, to secure a note of $5,000, dated December 4, 1917, due six months after date, assigned to the plaintiff, Enterprise Bank, January 3, 1920; the other was given to Pat Wall to secure a note of $2,500, dated December 7, 1917, due six months after date, assigned to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Jaselli v. Riggs National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1911
  3. Guerin v. HuntSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  4. Campbell v. LinderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API